Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/30/09:      Permalink
View Article Stats      (8 comments)

Cons Leave Out CON-TEXT, As Usual So They Can Twist Facts

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)

opednews.com

::::::::

 
IN CONTEXT, Sotomayor's remarks that have caused all the controversy were made while she was speaking at a symposium on the role of minority judges in race and gender discrimination cases ---IT WAS A SYMPOSIUM ON THAT SUBJECT.
And in context she was answering back and refuting a comment that had been made by Sandra Day O'Connor that 'wise men and women judges will rule the same way" on court cases. Sotomayor is arguing in the context of this quote that NO, a person's background and experience often ARE a factor in the conclusions they come to. And when a person of minority background
rules on a gender and discrimination case, if it is a woman in this case, she will be influenced differently from white judges by her minority background experience when deciding this kind of cases.
All she was doing was refuting Sandra Day O'Connor's statement to the effect that judges all rule according to the same instincts no matter what their gender or background. 
Sotomayor, at this forum,argued that, to the contrary, judges' minority gender and race will influence them naturally (as a human being) in the conclusions they come to in interpreting evidence in cases ABOUT THIS SUBJECT of discrimination and gender. 
When talking about race discrimination and gender discrimination, she was saying she "would hope that [in such a context] "a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male WHO HASN'T LIVED THAT LIFE" (bells and whistles go off here: "hasn't lived that life":aka the life of a minority person who has experienced as part of her background, such gender and race discrimination).
What is 'racist' about that? She was just stating the fact that people ARE influenced by their background when deciding cases as a judge in areas where they have experienced what is being ruled on. She wasn't making any invidious comparisons about the quality of white vs. minority judges, she was talking about how their expericience will give them different ways of perceiving information in relevant cases because of their life experience in that area. This speech was about minority and gender cases at a symposium.
The GOP is really good at cutting and pasting and leaving out context so they can cherry pick their agenda. I hope this brouhaha backfires on the Republican party and they finish alienating the hispanic vote. That will be the kiss of death on them ever winning national elections without the hispanic vote.

 

I live in the Pacific Northwest and I am interested in current affairs.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Take note of the word switcheroo by Scott on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:58:00 AM
Why do you come out of the woodwork at everything I post? by John Lorenz on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 8:43:09 AM
"Correctly interpret'? You beg the question. by John Lorenz on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 9:04:00 AM
Hi Scott did you oppose Samuel Alito's confirmation? by E. Nelson on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 10:26:36 AM
Why did Sotomayor say her experience was "better"? by John Lorenz on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 9:50:33 AM
I am 100% honest by Scott on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 5:04:26 PM
A couple other notes... by Scott on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 8:39:34 PM
Thank you John Lorenz for your thoughts on this by elena dumas on Monday, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:16:51 AM