Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

"Civil Rights - Uncivil Wrongs"

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

It was a serious error to select Rick Warren to give the inauguration prayer, at least it was an error if advancement of equal rights for ALL is still a goal.

::::::::

Or, Why Did Obama Bow to the Evangelical Homophobes?

    Just when I thought I could finally stop being embarrassed I was an American thanks to our leaders’ antipathy toward human rights this decade, President-elect Obama picked a certified homophobic to lead the nation in prayer on Inauguration Day.  It really put a sour note on the event for those who believe everyone deserves human rights, especially after the openly gay bishop who was hastily given a spot on Sunday’s pre-inaugural to counter the criticism ended up being cut from the broadcast.  What did that do for equality?

    Didn’t Obama learn anything from the Reverend Wright fiasco and how Wright subsequently used his connection to gain access to national megaphones?  Doesn’t he realize that Rick Warren, founder of the staunchly evangelical and ironically named Saddleback Church, will similarly use the opportunity to claim legitimacy for homophobia?  Does Obama think there was some sort of “signing statement” to the Bill of Rights and that he can pick and chose which portions he wants to obey?  Didn’t we get enough of that with the Bush Administration?  

    I supported black civil rights in 60s, women’s civil rights in the 70s and gay civil rights in the 80s, even though physically I was none of those groups.  I did it because I believed what I read in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  I became a lawyer in part to help defend those rights because I recognized from history that protecting those rights in others, protects rights for us all.  That is why it is hard to understand why Obama, of all people, would share the same podium with such an outspoken devoted opponent of equality, let alone be the one to invite him to share the national spotlight.  It is one thing to do so for the purpose of debating him, but to listen without comment and then minutes later plan to swear to obey the Constitution, the entire Constitution, appalls me.

    I understand that our replacement leader wants to eliminate polarization.  It is an admirable goal, but at what expense if in doing so it causes a regression in seeking equal rights for all?  While I remain hopeful, my hopefulness has been relegated to hoping it’s not back to being routinely embarrassed for being born in the US.  
                                
    In any event, too bad our leaders don’t seem to truly believe the poetic words they tell the world are important.

 

resistence-is-possible.blogspot.com

It's probably obvious I'm a CYNICAL PESSIMIST. Why a cynical pessimist? Possibly it's the result of expending a full lifetime defending, first with rifle in hand and then with a legal pad, "truth, justice and the American Way." Observing the less (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments