Tag(s): , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (13 comments)

Censorship on OpEdNews.

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      

opednews.com

I published a poll which was accepted and got four votes before I got a notice that it was being deleted. Meanwhile a much less meaningful poll was allowed to remain.

::::::::

Here's the poll that I posted:

Poll

How Many Votes Does Obama Need?

It has finally been proven that Gore won the popular vote in 2000 and that Kerry won the popular vote in 2004. But both conceded to Bush. Yet Democrats still appear to believe that if Obama wins the popular vote, he might not concede to McCain. What is the magic threshhold popular vote that could stop a Democratic presidential candidate from conceding to a Republican?

If Obama gets a simple majority of the popular vote, he won't concede.
If Obama gets at least 60% of the popular vote he won't concede.
Obama would need at least 70% of the popular vote not to concede.
There is no magic threshhold -- Democrats don't count the votes.

4 votes View Results and Comments

Here are the results before it was removed:

Poll

How Many Votes Does Obama Need?

It has finally been proven that Gore won the popular vote in 2000 and that Kerry won the popular vote in 2004. But both conceded to Bush. Yet Democrats still appear to believe that if Obama wins the popular vote, he might not concede to McCain. What is the magic threshhold popular vote that could stop a Democratic presidential candidate from conceding to a Republican?

If Obama gets a simple majority of the popular vote, he won't concede.
25% from 1 votes
If Obama gets at least 60% of the popular vote he won't concede.
0% from 0 votes

Obama would need at least 70% of the popular vote not to concede.
0% from 0 votes

There is no magic threshhold -- Democrats don't count the votes.
75% from 3 votes

4 votes Vote View Demographics Cross-Tab Results

 

Here's the letter from the editor accepting the poll:

Administrator to me
show details 5:17 AM (4 hours ago)
Reply
 
Thank you for submitting a poll to Op Ed News.

Your poll titled How Many Votes Does Obama Need?
has been accepted and is now published on the Op Ed News website at:
http://www.opednews.com/Poll/How-Many-Votes-Does-Obama-by-Mark-E-Smith-080808-864.html

This poll was submitted with tags 2008 Election Presidential, Democratic, Obama-Barack
And groups:

Thank you again.


Op Ed News Administrator

 

And here's the new letter removing the poll:

Administrator to me
show details 9:31 AM (33 minutes ago)
Reply
 
Thank you for submitting a poll to Op Ed News.

You submitted a poll titled:
How Many Votes Does Obama Need?

This poll was submitted with tags 2008 Election Presidential, Democratic, Obama-Barack
And groups:

Thank you but this article doesn't fit our website. However, we do appreciate your help. And suggest that you please try again.



Op Ed News Administrator


P.S. just not a well designed poll that will give meaningful info. A simpler one, will obama concede if the vote is close, if there are concerns about vote theft or election abuses? That would work. Your percentages don't make sense.

Your Original Submission is attached to this email

Please do NOT reply to this email; no one will see it.

If you'd like to reply to the editor, you may click the following link
to enter a message for the editor:
http://www.opednews.com/Messages/Anon2-490

 

And here's the sort of poll that Rob himself posts that he apparently believes is well-designed to give meaningful information:

 

Poll

Votingwise, Are you Sane or Psychotic?


Are you sane or Psychotic-- voting to end Eight Years of Shock Doctrine Presidency or Deludedly Supporting McCain, by voting for Him or any Third Party Candidate?

Any vote for anyone other than less than perfect Obama, who there is plenty to object about, is a vote for McCain, a vote for continuing with another four or more years of Disaster Capitalism, apocalyptic presidency. Anyway you slice it, votes for McKinney, Barr or Nader is a sign of irrationality at best, insanity at worst, IF you are in a swing state.

I'm voting for Obama even though he's far from perfect
58% from 80 votes
I'm sanely voting for a 3rd party in a safe blue state or hopeless red state.
30% from 42 votes
I'm Hebephrenic. Who are McKinney, Barr and Nader?
0% from 0 votes

I am irrationally voting for a 3rd party candidate even though I live in a swing state
12% from 17 votes

 

 

 

I'm an anti-civilizationist and election boycott advocate in San Diego. For reasons not to vote in faith-based elections with secret vote counts for candidates you cannot hold accountable if they fail to represent you, check out the discussions, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

thoughts by Better World Order on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:20:07 PM
Rob is, in general, much more lenient than I would be by Steven Leser on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:35:59 PM
Yes, this is Rob's site. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:09:34 PM
slanted by Tony Forest on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:07:58 PM
Taking things seriously. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:23:51 PM
Why would be voting for a third party by Stanimal on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:05:16 PM
Software risks. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:07:17 PM
Murphy's Golden Rule applies ... by Mr M on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:38:15 PM
apparently... by Rob Kall on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:50:22 PM
Making sense. by Mark E. Smith on Saturday, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:09:22 PM
Wrong on Censorship by Frank J. Ranelli on Friday, Aug 8, 2008 at 8:58:04 PM
There is no "censorship" on "private property." by waldopaper on Saturday, Aug 9, 2008 at 9:39:04 PM
I think you're right, Waldo. by Mark E. Smith on Monday, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:52:57 PM