Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (39 comments)

Boolean Algebra and Probability Theory Prove Official Explanation Inadequate

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      

opednews.com

Gotta love the diehard official explanationeers.

::::::::

Journal Article

What this journal article accomplishes in 4 modest pages that the tens of thousands of pages and "evidence" from the government do not is the fact that the official explanation is probably false.  In scientific terms, this means that a truly reasonable investigation of all of the evidence has yet to be conducted.  By anyone.

Based on the information and evidence that independent experts have reviewed and analyzed to date, it is clear that thermite or thermate was utilized in the demolition of the Twin Towers owing to its widespread presence (in an intact form) in dust samples collected shortly after the towers were demolished.  In support of this hypothesis, microscopic spherules of molten iron were also found in the WTC dust on a widespread basis shortly after demolition.  Iron microspheres prove both a higher than jet-fuel temperature present at the WTC demolition, site and a particularly violent explosion that would be required to disburse the microspheres throughout the demolition area.

My strong suggestion, at this point, would be for all 911 "Truthers" to cease and desist reference to the WTC site as a "tragedy" and begin calling it a "demolition" and, "an atrocity."  Murdering one's own citizens in numbers over a dozen or so changes a definition from mass-killing to atrocity.

When a government is involved in an atrocity against its own people, which seems to be approaching a 70% probability in this case, we call the atrocity a, "war crime."

Sufficient evidence and analysis now exists to indict the personnel operating in the entire top echelon of the executive branch at the time of the 911 atrocity for "Crimes Against Humanity."

It is for this reason and for the reason of the conduct of personnel within both the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury during the last days of the Bush Administration that I whole-heartedly support the movement of key persons from within the Secret Service to positions under the direct control of the President on January 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM.  No SES level personnel should be included in this movement and any organizational supplementation required should be taken from the ranks of the United States Marine Corps.

Oo-rah!  This one is for Smedley, boys.

 

Award winning poet, writer and refugee from the educational testing industry. Richard agitates, supports and motivates activists of all kinds, the most well-known being Cindy Sheehan. Web developer and designer by day, writer by night, Richard has (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
39 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Blah blah blah by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:26:02 AM
Thank you Tom by CasaZaza on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:02:01 PM
You're welcome by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:27:16 PM
Ad hominem, Tom. by Richard Volaar on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:50:57 PM
Better explanations? by albury smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:36:15 PM
To Murfy proves Nine-Eleven Op was an inside job by meremark on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:47:44 PM
All you need is one video of WTC7. by Harold Smith on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:56:11 PM
I wrote in several diaries by Mark Sashine on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:36:45 PM
You need nothing more abstract than Newton's Laws. by Harold Smith on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:22:59 PM
Please practice what you preach so consistently by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:32:07 PM
Turn Scurfy proves Nine-Eleven Op was an inside job by meremark on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:50:05 PM
Odious by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:45:55 PM
Tom by Mark Sashine on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:15:03 PM
Mark by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:11:26 PM
Colleagues by Alan Murphy Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:32:10 PM
Everyone respond to Tom this way: by David Watts on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:41:14 PM
Town Goofy proves Nine-Eleven Op was an inside job. by meremark on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:53:58 PM
Now I'm certain that Tom Murphy is a female by Alan Murphy Smith on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:06:20 PM
Nine-Eleven Op was an INSIDE JOB by meremark on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:58:26 PM
If Tom proved it as meremark says, by David Watts on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:30:12 PM
If an article title states I proved it, then it must be true by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:53:40 PM
Definitely A Dangerous Man... by Richard Volaar on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:06:32 PM
Flight 93 official explanation violates the laws of science by ken on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:56:50 AM
To all by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:26:46 AM
Your "researcher" by albury smith on Sunday, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:16:27 PM
It's your story, you prove it! by ken on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:34:39 AM
Prove yours by albury smith on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:58:22 AM
It's your theory! You prove it! by ken on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26:12 PM
by the way... by ken on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:31:56 PM
Good grief... by albury smith on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:40:48 PM
Ms. Smith by Alan Murphy Smith on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:07:01 PM
I've noticed... by albury smith on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:35:22 PM
Thank you, Albury... by ken on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:11:50 PM
Yes, Ken by albury smith on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:27:51 PM
DNA Evidence by Alan Murphy Smith on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:17:52 PM
Which fire is generating more heat? by Alan Murphy Smith on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:41:04 PM
Speculate on this by albury smith on Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:09:29 PM
Great picture!!! by Alan Murphy Smith on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:43:29 PM
More blatant deception from Dave and the "truth movement" by albury smith on Thursday, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:51:56 PM