Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 2 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

Beatles vs Stones

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

I had an odd dream recently: I was in the back of a car saying to the driver that by any objective standard, the Rolling Stones were a far greater band than the Beatles.

::::::::

For one, the Stones have been together for half a century, and have consequently been far more prolific than the Fab Four, whose career lasted only a few short years. Also, I felt (in the dream as well as in real life) that any song one could single out by the Beatles, one could find one at least as good (if not better) by the Stones.
Eventually Mick Jagger showed up in this dream (in black and white, and I believe for some time), and then I woke up when Keith Richards started playing a cutaway electric guitar (in color).
And odd dream, but I'd have to generally agree with myself on the main points.
The Beatles greatness, I think, is more cultural than artistic when viewed in relation to the Stones. The Beatles changed the world, and the Stones pretty much went along for the ride, but accomplished far more creatively in the process....


 

I am an aspiring mystic with a bit of experience in sales/marketing, currently living in the New York metro area with my books, candles & more books. I believe we, as a civilization, have reached the low ebb of an entire cycle (see "Hindu Yugas" & (more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

i DO love the stones, but one can only wonder what... by laurie steele on Friday, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:51:12 PM
The Beatles were more artistically creative and pr... by Chris Cook on Saturday, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:31:02 PM
Perhaps you actually need to look up the meaning ... by M. Wizard on Sunday, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:19:35 PM
The Beatles were more prolific in the sense of abu... by Chris Cook on Sunday, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:02:39 PM
i saw that and "let me roll it" is one of my all t... by laurie steele on Sunday, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:47:58 PM
There is much more to the Beatles music than just ... by Chris Cook on Sunday, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:11:59 PM
...to looking the word up. But "abundant" refers t... by M. Wizard on Sunday, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:06:25 PM
Your aural induced delusions are undeniably prolif... by Chris Cook on Sunday, Mar 24, 2013 at 5:29:16 PM