Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Authentic Bull Crap (ABC)

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)

opednews.com

Ray Bradbury said he was tring to "prevent" the future. Did he fail?

::::::::

In Ray Bradbury's novel, Fahrenheit 451, readers will find this passage (Del Rey paperback page 89):  "I remember the newspapers dying like huge moths.  No one wanted them back.  No one missed them."

Bradbury has said that he didn't predict the future he was trying to prevent it.

Could this Bradbury novel be the key to understanding contemporary American culture?  Earlier in the book he seems to anticipate what it would be like watching network news in the Bush and post-Bush era:  "If you don't want a man unhappy politically, don't give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one.  Better yet give him none.  Let him forget there is such a thing as war."

All this time liberal bloggers were arguing that the (pro-Liberal?) main stream media were joining with the conservative talk show hosts to advance Republican talking points.  In fact they were, as Bradbury predicted, merely trying to make people happy and forget their miseries and that mission is getting more and more important by the day.

ABC has been ahead of the curve for a long time.  Malcolm Gladwell, writing in his 1994 book, "The Tipping Point," (Little Brown and Company hardback edition) on pages 74 to 77, refers to a study that indicates that ABC has been trying to make people happy since at least 1984.  This passage summarizes those pages:  (starting on bottom of page 75)"Now here is where the study gets interesting.  Mullen and his colleagues then called up people in a number of cities around the country who regularly watch the evening network news and asked them who they voted for.  In every case those who watched ABC voted for Reagan in far greater numbers than those who watched CBS or NBC."

Watching ABC Monday (March 9, 2009), it was obvious they were still trying to make people happier by presenting only the Republican point of view.  Charlie Gibson referred to the assertion that President Obama may be attempting to address too many tasks simultaneously.

Hey, Chuckie, we have a few questions for a highly paid "journalist":  Did Ronnie the Ray-gun, Poppy, and Jr. all have a reputation for skimming over the details?  Since they occupied the White House for twenty of the last twenty-eight years, is is possible that their sloppy and slovenly management style contributed anything toward getting the country into some messy and unnecessary wars and a possible "recession"?  If so, could it possibly be that a more industrious and attentive style of management, that could, to a bunch of inept slackers, seem like it was too broad and inclusive in its goals, be the way to go?
 
Chickie, you overpaid propagandist, since you could be seen as being one of Rush Limbaugh's back-up "singers," and since you both dispense your pearls of wisdom from an omniscient stance, perhaps you could deign to inform your audience which style of management would best serve the country at this point in history.  Could it be that President Obama would please you more if he adopted Reagan's cursory span of attention during meetings style and dozed off occasionally?

If Bradbury was correct and if reassuring platitudes and talking points will be more comforting for an audience, maybe rather than pointing out the fact that ABC might be working toward the election of Jeb in 2012, we should see if Rush buys freelance opening monologs. 

If that is journalism, to offer to sell suggestions as to how Rush Limbaugh can peddle several Republican party objectives simultaneously in one - just one - of his starting diatribes, well then maybe it's time this columnist put more effort into making bucks rather than trying to make a Bradbury novel look prescient.

Does Journalistm really equal peddling Republican talking points for fun and profit? 

In the Thirties Germany gave up Democracy to achieve prosperity.  Tune in to ABC and look at Gibson's smiling face and ask yourself:  Do you want to live in a democracy or do you want to be happy and have prosperity return?  This could be Jeb Bush's big chance.
  
Australia's ABC is different from and better than the United States' ABC.  That's just my opinion.  Maybe you should ask Rush about all this.

Brian Mullen is quoted (page 76 - 77 of "The Tipping Point):  "Jennings showed more smiles when referring to the Republican candidate that the Democrat, and again in a phone survey viewers who watch ABC were more likely to have voted for Bush."

Now, the disk jockey will play Johnny Cash's "Ring of Fire" and we will blaze a trail out of here.  Have a "when I snap my fingers, you will remember nothing of this" type week.
 

 

 

BP graduated from college in the mid sixties (at the bottom of the class?) He told his draft board that Vietnam could be won without his participation. He is still appologizing for that mistake. He received his fist photo lesson from a future (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments