Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (36 comments)

Attacking Richard Gage, AIA, and why it doesn't work - Part 1

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

::::::::

A new website was launched into cyber world aimed at debunking Richard Gage, AIA and the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. Voice Writer and Actor Joseph Nobles – better known as blogger Bolo Boffin, has decided to take on facts with his opinion once again and call it truth, this time attacking Richard Gage, AIA.

Prematurely launching his site before its completion, ae911truth.INFO is relatively bare except for some commentary directed at 28 slides from Richard Gage’s PowerPoint presentation on how and why the Towers fell on Sept. 11th, 2001. The site is laid out nicely, however the commentary is just that, opinionated commentary no different then found in an Op Ed . The commentary is presented to the world as if Mr. Bolo is some sort of authority on a parallel with Richard Gage, AIA and his peers. I guess as an Actor he is just playing the part, it makes one wonder though who pays him to take the stage.

Nobles’ rebuttal begins with slide one of Gage’s presentation where he focuses not on the content of slide one so much, but instead tries desperately to find ways in which to convince or warn the reader of Gage’s magical skills of mass hypnosis, or what he calls appeal to authority. Pointing out Gage’s use of the AIA logo and title – which by the way Gage has every right to use, Nobles asserts,

“Richard Gage is not engaging in his professional practice here. He is not dealing with the design or the livability of the World Trade Center complex. He is a part of a team that designs and builds buildings, and not part of a team that tears them down”.

Nobles wants the reader to believe that Gage has no experience with building structure, but that statement makes little sense to support that, and certainly proves no point let alone the one he is trying to make.

Like an attorney getting ready to sum up his case (his character changes often, try to keep up if you can) Nobles goes on to say,



“Therefore, whenever you see the AIA logo, remember that this is an attempt by Gage to enhance his authority to speak about something he has no expertise in. He is propping himself up with this trade association. Don't be fooled”.

He follows that by labeling ae911truth members as conspiracy theorists and says they are not a professional group, but an advocacy group. Maybe he should have said they were advocacy group of professionals? Nah, that would be asking too much of a professional debunker to debunk his own bunk now wouldn’t it?

By using fancy terms like Appeal to Authority, Argument ad Populum, and
Affirming the Consequent Nobles tries to sound authoritative regarding Gage’s credentials, research, evidence and his cause. He even appeals to his readers by complimenting Gage on a personal level by saying,

“Richard Gage is a mild-mannered, likable person. He generates a great deal of sympathy as a speaker because of this. He seems genuine to me in his desire to see justice done for the 9/11 attacks. Therefore, the best I can say for him is that he is terribly misguided”.

Sounds kind of sweet doesn’t it?

Don’t be fooled by the sugar coated venom because what most of his readers don’t or wont know, is on Jan. 1st, 2008 – the day he launched the sight, he also had this to say about his shiny new site, Richard Gage and the ae911truth colleagues,

“This one is my very own. I noticed that Richard Gage and his gang of fruit loops weren't using the domain name ae911truth.info, so I am.

I'm working on it slowly, very slowly. I'm only up to 28 slides out of over 300 hundred in that wretched PowerPoint of his. However, I was contacted by someone who knows Gage. I evidently popped up in a search engine. The gig is up, so the doors are open to the public.

Unlike Gage, I have no plans to plead for your money. Please save it for more worthy causes than myself. Enjoy!”.
*Source: Boloboffins Democratic Underground Journal

This self-proclaimed debunker has zero credentials, training, or professional experience on the subject of Richard Gage’s research let alone any authority to pass himself off as if he does by mere expression and conjecture. He is quite simply an Actor on a self-erected stage continuing the monologue people have been ignoring. The only thing he is an authority on is self-promotion like the big bolo, bolo tube, and the best of bolo. If this is the best of bolo, Gage and his crew have nothing to worry about.

*Source:

Bolo Boffin Blog

Everything in the known universe about boloboffin


To be continued - this is part 1 in a series… MTR News

 

http://unitedfor911truth.com/

Cheri Roberts is a longtime activist and writer who has worked in mixed media for 15 yrs. With 911 Truth as a primary focus, she participates in and organizes for events both locally and nationally always striving to get people out of their chairs (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The debunking site by Cheri Roberts on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 9:33:39 PM
keep up the good work Cheri by richard on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 11:46:31 PM
I get my money from the government? by Joseph Nobles on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 9:03:12 PM
labor of love? by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:29:13 AM
Thanks by Cheri Roberts on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 10:49:43 AM
No need to attack when Mr. Gage opens his mouth by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 7:33:45 PM
Gee Tom by richard on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 10:06:55 PM
And thus... we see the results of too much "anti" in a bio by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 11:01:54 PM
Howdy! by Joseph Nobles on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 8:59:28 PM
They are "sensitive" people these Truthers by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 9:33:10 PM
Tom's a sensitive guy by richard on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 10:12:38 PM
Thank you, Tom by Joseph Nobles on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 2:49:35 AM
Hello Joseph by Cheri Roberts on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 9:34:56 PM
Research? by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 9:48:20 PM
very classy indeed by richard on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 10:37:29 PM
I never mentioned "very classy" - those are your words by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 10:57:05 PM
You are *confined* because...? by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:55:37 AM
And...? by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 10:55:36 AM
Tom's exercise in dissimulation by richard on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 9:20:39 AM
Is there a Code Blue in OEN? by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 2:37:44 PM
Research> Yer askin me? by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:15:40 AM
Yup, I'm asking you! by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 11:11:50 AM
You have no issue with what I choose to do? by Joseph Nobles on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 3:01:59 AM
Heya Tom? and anyone ekse with a beef? by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:23:41 AM
I have no beef - just concerns by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 11:23:39 AM
And in the meantime by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 12:45:39 PM
Emotion and reason by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 3:21:20 PM
NIST by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 3:36:41 PM
Science by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 9:38:37 PM
maybe, but... by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 10:43:52 PM
This could go on, like, 4eva - but I've said my points by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 11:29:33 PM
BTW Joseph aka Bolo by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:51:16 AM
There's no need to meet with Richard Gage by Joseph Nobles on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 2:47:56 AM
Why and why not? by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 12:37:52 PM
Checkmate by Michael Fury on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:05:03 PM
yes it is and by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:23:36 PM