::::::::
I am watching in amazement at Andrea Mitchell's continual adovocacy for McCain's risky VP pick, Sarah Palin.
Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz pointed out the objective fact that Palin is being investigated for corruption. Mitchell proceeded to throw cold water on these facts, with some bizarre speculation that Palin was protecting some amorphous "victim."
Further, Mitchell went on to talk about Palin "family values experience." What does that mean, exactly? Because she's pro-life? So anyone who isn't pro-life cannot claim to care about family values in Mitchell's estimation?
