::::::::
I think it is time to stop BS-ing round. Liberals came into control with the election of a president whose middle name is "Hussein." The Liberal is no longer the "rebel" as he was under Bush's administration. Liberal is now mainstream. From what we have seen with the corrupt bank bail-outs, we have to accept Liberals are capitalists just like conservatives. "Hussein" supports the trickle-down theory, despite his election promises. Liberals may have posed as otherwise at times, but the Liberal radio, NPR, with all its duplicity dutifully has its "Market Report" and the NPR staff jumps for joy each time the stock market jumps. They honestly see themselves as environmentalists, and claim to care about "all the children in the world," but they ignore the fact that Capital only exploits, Capital only destroys, grinding the Earth into waste.Rationalization is a much stronger component of Liberalism than Conservatism. Conservatives, technically Libertarians, are bald-faced liars; their culture has honestly embraced Capital exploitation since the slavery of Blacks. Liberals have to lie far more effectively to be able to field their hypocrisy that Capital can be made environmental by forcing subsidies of Liberal-looking cars such as hybrids, and can be friendly to the communities that Capital exploits. More than anyone, Liberals have promoted global warming by promoting "fairness" in global Capital -- giving the dominant cultures of the world all the benefits of the downside of America: a purely wasteful culture. Fair is fair, after all -- even if it kills us all.
The choices seem obvious. Understand that Capital is now dominated by Liberals, and despite what Liberals have said, Capital is here to stay in its purely fascistic original Roman format, complete with capital punishment; the Liberal choice. One choice is to embrace Capital, and try to work with it to alter the economy towards a sane program that includes the planet's survival (you live on the planet Earth), or at least recruit Capital's saner people into the real causes of liberation.
The other strategy is to fight the problem by moving farther into the fringes and away from Liberal hypocrisy with the comfort that our enemies from the East has perfected our very own home-grown strategy with unending success: guerrilla warfare. We can also take comfort in the fact that fundamental, rural, and military-based core America is gunning for Hussein. All out war.
Red Neck States of America
The United "red neck" States of America are awash with weapons: two for every man, woman, and child. Beyond this, those who over the years have adapted our very own native tactical strategies, especially the dangerous al Qaeda, have shown us how to make weapons from just about anything: shampoo, shoe soles, home-made tank killers. The opposition, being the South, is also the military -- so in the end there won't be much resistance. The resistance will probably be in the form of guilt-based propaganda: the work of psychologists. Their kind of talk become laughable in the face of the types of military realities that they have, in fact, helped create over the past century.
So the issue is not about getting guns, but where to point them. And to use them in such a way that we don't get the "revolutionary" full-circle effect that typically nullifies original intent, such as with the French revolution, where an emperor, Napoleon, ultimately replaced a King. Napoleon's revolution was real, and replaced the inheritance of the nobles with government meritocracy, but that is not the type of change the American people are looking for. They want medical care, decent jobs, and their nation and communities back in their hands.
Their hands? Exactly whose hands is national control in right now? Certain not American hands, the numbers clearly show that. Graphs from this article created from Department of Labor statistics shows that the US is being financially raped by, or perhaps for the benefit of, foreign countries, specifically China. They show that Americans real wealth has nearly disappeared, and that Americans today survive on debt. As much as we would like to blame China, and the so-called Chinese government is truly and evil dictatorship, China has not so much as postured hostility against the US for many decades. The problem can be called foreign-ism, but it is an internal problem: foreignists within.
American slide since 1973:
China is getting all our cash -- by design!
The idea of foreignists should bring to mind the topic of nativism, which if you read about it in the Wikipedia, means roughly racism. According to the current academic material, those who are native to a region are necessarily racist. This is of course impossible, as only a small proportion of humans are actually defective enough to be truly racist, so those writing about nativsm must have an ulterior motive, and that motive is very likely relate to the biggest threat natives around the world feel: colonialism, annexation, and environmental exploitation. To that we can add slavery and modern day versions of human exploitation and marginalization that are effectively as damaging as slavery.
It can easily be shown that colonists are just about the worst kind of human, and since their bias against natives is consistent, there very likely is a psychological basis for the basic human disregards, and perhaps genocidal tendencies. It can also be shown that this kind of anti-empathy is nearly always hereditary; it may possibly genetic.
Foreignist Roots
For me the "foreignist conspiracy" starts in 1969, when Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has President Nixon order American bombers away from anti-bomber missile sites in North Vietnam during that war. The missiles were successfully bringing down American bombers as they flew to Hanoi, but the sites themselves were un-molested because, as Kissinger told us, the sites had Communist Chinese technicians. Behind Kissinger's unusual treachery was his plan to begin US trade with China. Kissinger worked hard to destroy Vietnam, now an American ally, but also worked hard to befriend China in such a way that China could bring the US into ruinous debt.
Latin American Narcotics, and example of foreignist cooperation between Left and Right
To the south we have Mexico, a close American ally: the World's most crimialized nation. 50% of Mexico's income is derived from drug smuggling, and 50% of it's income comes from Mexicans in the US who have undercut American Labor. The cost in terms pure insanity caused by the drugs themselves, cocaine, heroin and methedrine, cannot be calculated, yet Mexico has a continual green light for its activities. Any attempt to criticize Mexico, and any attempts to defend the US from job loss, community destruction, and drug infiltration is met with accusations of hate crimes, usually in courts by Liberals supporting prosecutors and enforcers. Mexico has American enforcement wrapped around its little finger. Mexicans are often allowed to go free by enforcers for all their endless crimes, and yet they fill our prisons. We are told Mexicans, and other Latin Americans, are hard workers and deserving of our jobs. We should accept, according to their White supporters, that we are inferior and should suffer thus: we are Nativist.
Few Blacks support Latin American infiltration and annexation. Blacks are traditionally the poorest, along with the true Natives, and are not only the primary victims of job loss, degradation and further marginalization, but are also the target for drug use. Immigrant felons from Black nations, such as Jamaica and Haiti, and even from Africa, assist immigrants from Latin America in cocaine distribution to Black communities, though notable Americas have become rich from this trade.
The benefits for the sadists of local lock-ups, and state and federal prisons is obvious, though locals tend to be the most lenient in this crime reality and federal enforcers and judges the most cruel.
Historical roots in the Second World War
The CIA is still held to blame for the initial addicting infusions of cocaine in the US. After the Iran Contra scandal that re-installed the Republicans, the CIA paid debts to El Salvadorean fascists for their assistance in organizing the "Contra" resistance to Nicaragua's socialist government by allowing El Salvadorians to set up a cocaine pipeline into South Central Los Angeles.
The CIA was formed from the OSS that did the cloak-and-dagger stuff against the Nazis in WWII. Soon after WWII, we entered into the Cold War, where the CIA amalgamated itself around fascist doctrine to fight the Soviet Union, itself an excellent example of fascist state as much an evolution of the ancient Roman state as Western Capital.
Coming out of the Second World War, was obviously the formation of Israel: a home nation for the Hitler's Jewish victims. But nearly unmentioned in Jewish-written histories of the resettlement of Israel after so many thousands of years are the natives, the Palestinians, historically known as the Philistines in the Bible, for instance. Clearly Israel's problems with the natives they have nearly successfully displaced in a pogrom not a lot different from the pogroms Jews have suffered has a lot of problems in the Mid East, and those problems have been felt in the US. Lieberman, a self-described independent Jewish liberal, has worked hard to bring the US to war with both Muslim factions, Shiia and Sunni: Iraq and Iran.
When Israel went to destroy all of Southern Lebanon, including its allies there, in retaliation for an act by Hezbollah, and then made what appeared to be a final attempt at the extermination of the Palestinians of the Gaza Strip (historical Philistine), before the ouster of the American fascist George Bush, ending the attack just prior to Obama's inauguration, the world took notice, and Israel became in the eyes of all, especially Americans, a predator nation, and not necessarily still the victim of Nazi oppression, if it ever was.
It is with pride that Jews hold disproportionate dominance population-wise in the highest professions in the US: doctors, bankers, lawyers, and financial policy makers. The strongest bankers, and the strongest banks have Jewish names: GoldmanSacs, Greenspan. And even the greatest swindler: Maddoff. The greatest psychologist, Aaron Beck a Jew born in Rhode Island, attempted an American analyses in his book "Prisoners of Hate," but when he described American elitism, he was really describing Israeli Zionism. None of the people mentioned here have real connections with the American environment, despite their disproportionate dominance, even if they have been born here. They are in no way American Natives.
As GoldmanSacs was a primary beneficiary of the bailouts, it has attracted attention to itself. As stories unfold and the onion is peeled back, Paulson, Bush's financial secretary is shown as as a former GoldmanSacs president, and stands accused of influence peddling on GoldmanSacs behalf, and on behalf of all Capital itself. Paulson's association with Bush and his heritage that includes a relationship with Adloph Hitler by his grandfather during the formation of Nazi military strength shows a far right connection that is historically anti-Jewish, yet he was the CEO of a bank formed by Jews known as Zionist Bankers for their successful formation of Israel during the 1950s from Jewish war refugees who had (perhaps purposefully) not been repatriated. Judisam has also dominated education, social science, and even pacifism and social science, so exactly how did these endless duplicities come to define Judiasm in America? The answer is simple, the divisions are not vertical between cultures, but horizontal within cultures. The struggle is between the genuine normal people and the "genious:" those who are geniuses at hurting other people, the opposite of ingenious.
What is wrong?
These examples give good ideas of where the guns might be pointed when "pay back" time comes, but still, we must be careful of the circuitous nature of revolution. We don't want to make so many sacrifices just to put assholes back in control.
But what is REALLY wrong?
Lets take the worst of the worst, such as Stalin, Hitler and Saddam Hussein, and look at the latest research about them. They are all said to be malignant narcissists. We all know narcissism very well, cocaine is powered narcissism, with psychosis often added into the mix. Cocaine users are separated from any feelings others may have about them, their empathic neurons and self-questioning constructs are shut down, if they every existed.
What do do?
All we need to do to fix our society, and every society, is look for cases of these missing components in the people we know, the people who control us, and in our national leaders. To be able to control this condition, we need to be close to those who control us, which implies that we need not only small but specifically local government: the federal government is obsolete, and dangerous. This strategy of smallness and local self-determination is actually convenient, as it can be thought of as a confederacy: something the South has wanted for a long time. And the South has long controlled the military as an after effect of the Civil War.
Economics and Rebellion
Rattlesnake Manifesto
Americans kill, so what is the kindest way to kill?
Hyper-DE-flation makes sense
Lies of the Times: Obama needs to fufill his promise
Beginning the American Break-Up: Ending the CIA
Inflation Key to the Recession Cycle
