::::::::
Finally after much patience I received some emails I hoped would support Impeachment of Bush and Cheney. They are from Congressman Steve Cohen, and Senator Mike Gravel.This is the email I received from Congressman Cohen:
February 4, 2008 Dear Mr. Esq., Thank you for taking the time to express your views and verbalize a call for impeachment. I share your disappointment and distrust in this Administration. The countless allegations of misconduct and the Administration's mindful disdain for the will of the people are highly alarming. In keeping with this view, I have cosponsored House Resolution 333, which contains articles of impeachment for Vice President Cheney. While I will not ignore or understate the severity of the offenses perpetrated by the President himself, many of the Administration's most egregious violations of both fundamental American laws and norms of government can be traced directly back to the Vice President. The Vice President must be held to account for driving the Administration's willful disregard for the rule of law. I hope that you will feel free to contact me at any time to voice your opinions on legislation before the House. I am very interested in hearing the views of my constituents. If you would like to receive periodic E-news updates from my office, please sign up on my website: http://www.cohen.house.gov.
As always, I remain,
Most sincerely,
Steve Cohen
Member of Congress
The following is the email I received from Senator Gravel’s Campaign Manager Elliott Jacobson:
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:59:28 -0500
"Elliott Jacobson"
"Dominic Jermano" djermano@yahoo.com
Re: Impeachment The Senator strongly believes that both President Bush and Vice President Cheney should be impeached. He also believes that there should be a new investigation of 9/11.
Elliott Jacobson
Gravel 08
Here is my response to both the Congressman and Senator:
Dear Congressman Cohen, Thanks for your email. You should get my name right. It's not Mr. Esq. it is Mr. Dominic Jermano.
I am glad you are doing something toward Impeachment. Although you place most of your efforts toward impeaching Cheney, I think Bush must be included. He allows Cheney to break the law, he is as guilty. Likewise I believe people who do not stand for impeachment also are breaking the law, and violating their oath of office in protecting the Constitution, something the President considers a “God Damn piece of paper.”
For now I wish for you to read the following in concern to real historical understanding. And at the end of the piece will show really where the need for Impeachment is necessary. Impeachment is not so much just getting them out of office, but to bring justice to the innocents in Iraq. Impeaching the Bush administration will stop the violence in Iraq, and bring a sense of closure and healing to not only Iraq, but the entire region. People will begin to sense a change and that there really is Justice in the world. Impeachment will unite Iraq, and allow the early withdrawal of American troops. Impeachment is for Iraq, more than for Americans, but really it is for the Constitution and our government, that we are a Nation of Law and Human Rights to all people in the world. I support you with further proceedings.
Understanding Iraq's Real History
By: Dominic Jermano
Iraq's problems stem from the early Opium Trade days. It was a time when the USA was shipping its Opium from Turkey to Kuwait, headed for China. This and the compounded troubles began when they stole Kuwait from Iraq. And it has been the center to the animosity and conflict, along with the eventual Statehood of Israel.
Now the USA has added the rest of Iraq to its Kuwait conquest. I think the only remedy to have Iraq come back as a normal society is when they impeach Bush and Cheney rendering justice served for the innocent Iraqi people killed by them. Removing the American troops is necessary; along with Impeachment. This would ease the tensions, that justice is coming to Iraq from the War crimes that not only happened from the recent US invasion, but crimes that have been committed more than a century ago, due to the American involvement in the Opium Trade to China, and Japan.
The trade of Opium from Turkey and India took hold of the people in China, making some Chinese merchants very rich who supported the Opium influx into the country. Then there was the China government who saw its destructive affect on the people, when people became addicts and roaming vagabonds, and knew right away Opium had to be stopped. There was war, and who lost? China lost.
They became captives to British and USA interests. The Opium trade was not stopped. What happened was it expanded and the West wanted to go into Japan. Japan did not want Opium in their country either. Britain gained sizable properties such as Hong Kong, and Kowloon; and the USA wanted similar quests, so they went after Japan.
We all witnessed time evolved, and we have our own opinions about history, but the fact is WWI was really about the Opium Trade, when Germany wanted to get in on it, and take the growing fields in Turkey that the USA controlled, who shipped the Opium through Iraq, and exported from the ports of Kuwait.
Germany was going to join the Ottoman Empire and this would have given Germany ownership rights, cutting off US interests. With the UK and US partnership in the black slave market in North America, the British supported the USA and incited economic hardship on the Serbs, prompting a Serb national to assassinate Arch Duke Ferdinand who was negotiating the deal for Germany. This erupted into WWI; but it is without knowing if Germany would have used the fields to grow and continue the Opium Trade. It is clear other economic trade commodities were in badly need of support.
From the ravages of WWI it produced WWII.
China was being controlled by the West and essentially had no government, with the West having control of China's Capitol City, Nanjing. Japan was fighting against Western Imperialism, to include preventing the West from infiltrating Japan with Opium. Japan really invaded Nanjing to oust the Western Opium hold.
The slaughter of 300,000 people was the precipitous in having the West withdraw. Our similar comparison to this idea of killing innocent people to reach a political objective is seen when the Bush administration willingly killed innocent people in Iraq with higher numbers and on going DU poisoning to get Oil resources, and shore up their previous crimes to Iraq when they stole Kuwait. They waged a false war when Saddam did not do 911, and clearly found no WMD.
So those who wish to discount the relevance that Japan did not kill 300,000 people to stop the West but only to take over China is quite naive.
Japans Opium Experience:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/om/om3.htm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/sassoon.htm
http://www.pa-chouvy.org/drugtradeinasia.html
http://www.seansite.net/thailand/history/the-opium-trade-1940-1950
http://www.amoymagic.com/OpiumWar.htm
http://www.samurai-archives.com/snj.html
There may have been elements in Japan society to smuggle opium for profit; but clearly the supplies came from the West. Anyone who would think Japan simply murdered people for the sake of their own imperialistic agenda without a consensus in stopping the drug suppliers is mistaken. Interesting that the West; killed people to bring Opium into China and Japan. While the notion that Japan would not attack Nanjing because of the Opium trade is without a clue to the real happenings of the times.
Japan was, as far as I know, the only colonial power to execute faithfully the principles of opium suppression set forth at the Hague Convention in 1912, for Japan had been fighting opium addiction, at home and in her colonies, for decades. Japan persistently argued that drug trafficking was not only immoral but, in the long run, unprofitable.
One of Japan's top priorities after taking Taiwan in 1895 was to end opium use. European smugglers were impotent against Japan's efficient police organization and tight surveillance investigations. Opium-related deaths in Taiwan plummeted from 215,476 in 1908 to 38,000 annually by 1923. Japan also suppressed opium smuggling into Korea.
At the Second Opium Conference, Mr. Sugimura of Japan complained that it "was beneath a nation's dignity to derive so much revenue from opium," and he urged Western powers to view the problem not just from a humanitarian viewpoint but from an economic one, noting that in Taiwan, "Even from the economic and financial point of view, a sacrifice of revenue from opium was in reality a gain, since the productive power of the nation increased."
In fact Japan proved its objective when later it attacked Pearl Harbor. WWII was about stopping the Opium Trade, for Japan, while WWII for Hitler was about regaining what Germany lost in the first WW. Hitler was really against the Communists in Russia, and it should be noted that Communists were also Jews.
The West did not make the War out to be Hitler against the Communists because that would have been a good thing for the West. But instead they made it a personal fight against a race of people. And although it was Hitler's War against Jews, it was really Hitler's war against the Communists because the Jews were Communists.
Famous Americans supported Hitler to include George Bush's grandfather Prescott Bush who was instrumental in helping finance Hitler's objectives. But when Britain and France declared War in Germany, the prevailing FDR joined the Allies Forces to stop Hitler. The fight became more pronounced when Hitler's, generals began the final solution, in mass murdering thousands of Jews during the holocaust, in response to Allis Air Raids that targeted innocent German Citizens such as in Dresden. .
In fact China gained its foothold when the Japanese invaded Nanjing. This act proved that China must come to grip with saving China. Chairman Mao was the man to start such action. Chairman Mao was fighting the Kuomintang, and Japan. They wanted to expel all foreign influence. It is not so much that Chairman Mao started Communism, but the people wanted it, and they grew in strength. They could only defeat the evil forces that came to their land if they joined forces, and so the communists were born.
Needless to say, the poppy cultivation was introduced into the country by the colonialists as it is not indigenous to Myanmar. Opium dens were even allowed to open freely in the country despite strong objection from the people, Buddhist clergy and the American Baptist missionaries. Later, in the early 1950s, the Kuomintang (KMT) troops which were forced out of the Southern Yunnan Province of China by the People's Liberation Army of the People's Republic of China, took refuge and established base camps in Myanmar territory. They were encouraged, supported and financed by a western power with the aim of blocking further communist expansion in Asia. In the aftermath of the Second World War, the CIA encouraged the production of opium in the region to help finance its own activities and its KMT allies. The proceeds were also used to pay for the considerable arsenal of arms supplied to the KMT and other various groups in Myanmar. No doubt, these activities also sowed the seeds of the current drug production problems in the border areas of Myanmar. After the bulk of the KMT were flown out of Myanmar, remnants of two divisions of the KMT remained active in those areas until 1996. They encouraged not only poppy cultivation in the golden triangle area as well as on the Myanmar-Yunnan (PRC) border, but were also responsible for the refining of opium into heroin and creating heroin markets in the region.
(http://www.ibiblio.org/obl/docs/chr2001nv-en.htm)
Indeed the Kuomintang was defeated as they ran from the Mainland to Taiwan. Chairman Mao fought valiantly against the Japanese, and the War ended really before Japan was bombed by Harry Truman's 2 terrorist's Atomic bomb wiping out thousands of innocent Japanese civilians. Japan surrendered much earlier, but Truman refused to accept it because they wanted to use the bomb on Japan to send a message around the world.
Truman first wanted to get Russia to stop its advance; when clearly the Russians defeated Hitler. The bomb would be the ace card to who had the authority to say and grant Israel the right to form its own Religious State. There being; Israel became a State power, and Britain relinquished its empire hold on the region.
We can say that the assault on Nanjing really was the beginning to China, and the end to the Opium Trade market in China; that is the control the west had on it. China's closed door was its victory to the long years of Opium influx the West infected China with.
As far as China being Communism, I think it is more of COM unionism. This meaning that there is an emerging peace objective that is recognized. China does not have War ambitions.
They are only concerned with their own country. They have no ambitions to spread their type of government practices, by force. They are wise to know force never wins the hearts of people, and know that over throwing another government inevitably affects innocent people. They are first hand examples to the experience.
The truth of history has never been really told correctly. This is why the troubles have erupted with creating leaders such as Saddam. But the real murderers are still in power today.
The following explains the real parameters to Bush the Hostage Killer.
There was a bank robbery and the guy was holding 100 hostages inside. They called the authorities, and the standoff was going on 3 weeks, when the President came in and told them to end it. They bombed the building and killed everyone inside, including the bank robber.
Is the President guilty of murdering all the hostages, before the robber made good on his attempt? And what about the bank robber, who apparently had no gun, but a bag of wooden blocks thought to be a bomb!
Is the President guilty of murder, or is the Police force, who the President will say did not carry out his instructions like he asked them to? So now the officers who were doing as they were told by the President are now being the scapegoat of the President. Is this the standard way they practice Law in the United States?
Now I heard of a similar standoff with a country in the Middle East called Iraq. Thing is they knew the bank robber was holding people hostage, but people could not tell where he was at the moment. The US thought they were protecting the robber named Saddam Hussein, and so did torture to people to get them to tell where he was!
Some even killed innocent kids and families to make people fear for their lives, and thousands were killed. It is said more people died by this act than the people who died in Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. It is said more people died than the people in China's Nanjing massacred by the Japanese prior to WWII.
And yet America accepts these outlaw acts because after all they did kill the robber, Saddam, and well it's just too bad for those who died? Where is justice for the innocent killed? Is this how we win the hearts of the people?
I think it is pretty clear that America's President is guilty of lies, when he killed more people than the bank robber.
There is an urgent need for justice and accountability.
And then there is another problem; the lies from the 911 investigation.
PS: I wish you would include Impeachment as a Topic of Discussion on your website. There is also the fact that I am unable to have my own copy of the email I sent you. I wish your email network would provide this, or give us your email so we can send from our own mailbox.
My thanks to Congressman Cohen, and Senator Mike Gravel who have a keen sense of knowing the real law of the land in concern to history in this world, where Political Crooks have started wars, on pretexts of lies before them, having killed and maimed many good unknowing veterans, and families across the world spectrum. I look forward to bringing Justice to America and to the Innocent People who have died from the hands and orders from these Political Criminal Leaders.
Withal Astute Patriotism,
Mr. Dominic E. Jermano
