Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

A Better Plan?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (16 fans)

opednews.com

The theft of a lifetime continues and nobody will go to jail, but will take pleasure in bringing down the greatest nation in the world.

::::::::

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000168 EndHTML:0000003371 StartFragment:0000000489 EndFragment:0000003354

We, the people, have been sold a bill of goods in this bailout (actually nothing more than the Saving & Loans swindle in disguise -- give them credit for learning from that theft as this time nobody will do jail time) --- and are watching as the “haves” get more right in front of our eyes.


Imagine receiving stock at less than half the value of what we are paying and being told we are now 'owners' of these thieves.


Why wouldn't it have been a better plan, if we had to give these people money, to loan them the money at an interest rate they have deemed as fair. For example, presently people are paying as much as 30% on their credit card loans along with other conditions such as 'minimum payment due', therefore it must be these banks consider that as fair so that is what we charge them for the loan we give them. It most likely would take long for them to reduce drastically the interest they charge their customers in order to get their interest rate adjusted in kind. The result would be to give consumers more money (at no additional cost to the government) as the 'minimum payment due' would be less thus assisting our economy, even reducing the number of foreclosures. The consumer would still owe the same principle to the banks, however, would not not have as high a monthly pay out. Under this plan the banks could control their pay out as well by altering their obnoxious interest rates, rates that sent loan sharks to prison in the 1920's.


Now it may be said these banks are receiving this money in order to allow them to stay in business. However, this is not the case as most of them are presently operating in the black, but are using the money to purchase other banks. In addition to this the tax laws have been changed to give these purchasers a tax break as they can offset their tax obligation to the amount of the red ink of those banks they are purchasing. They are receiving tax breaks for taking our money, and giving us a token in way of non-voting stock. We, the taxpayer, is not only giving these banks money, but is also losing money in lower tax revenues.


In the meantime the corporate media propagandists are occupying our thoughts through such issues as gay marriage, three senatorial races, and the moronic Sarah Palin (yet they do not even point out the fact she contradicts herself from one 'exclusive' interview to the next.)

 

Dennis Kaiser is an author and consultant focusing on individual rights. As a US citizen Dennis is deeply concerned over how our nation has fallen from being productive and full of hope to one where that hope is being stripped from the majority as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments