Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (31 comments)

9/11 What is so hard to understand?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)

opednews.com

::::::::

What is so hard to understand about a 757 not being able to fit through a hole SMALLER than a 757? And its not just smaller, it’s MUCH smaller. If 9/11 was indeed carried out by 19 mostly Saudi Arabian hijackers, why won’t they show us any of the many videos that would clearly show a 757 hitting the Pentagon? Is it a case of National Security? Just imagine just what that would do to our National Security to actually be able to see a 757 hitting the Pentagon. Just imagine. After all, its unimaginable how seeing real 767’s hit the Twin Towers must have hurt our National Security.

Again: If 9/11 was indeed carried out by 19 mostly Saudi Arabian hijackers, why won’t they show us any of the many videos that would clearly show a 757 hitting the Pentagon? The only video of the many that would have shown just what hit the Pentagon that we have so graciously been been able to see, is that ridiculous 5-frame video showing a little white missile-like thing hiding behind a little post. Why can’t American citizens figure out that the video does show a little white missile-like thing and does NOT show a 757? If you want -- and apparently many do not want -- to see what a 757 would have looked like in that ridiculous 5-frame video, watch this:

 

I'm a dull and simple lad Cannot tell water from champagne

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
31 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Well... by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 12:36:40 PM
Its just bizarre ... by David Watts on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 1:48:16 PM
Re: "9/11 What is so hard to understand?" by Munich on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 2:29:13 PM
It's really quite easy to understand by CasaZaza on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 4:03:26 PM
What an excellent quote! by Cheri Roberts on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 7:08:40 PM
They're Hiding in Plain Sight! by boomerang on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 5:03:19 PM
You're right about the pain... by CasaZaza on Friday, Feb 1, 2008 at 8:35:26 PM
Boomerang, you are exactly right. by David Watts on Saturday, Feb 2, 2008 at 11:58:53 PM
David, you say: by Robert Hoogenboom on Saturday, Feb 2, 2008 at 4:27:49 AM
I have only been somewhat aware by David Watts on Saturday, Feb 2, 2008 at 4:41:10 PM
Thanks for writing your article in the first place, David! by Robert Hoogenboom on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:57:17 AM
Here's a good one by Professor James Fetzer by Robert Hoogenboom on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 6:02:02 AM
There's four in this series. by Robert Hoogenboom on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 6:25:20 AM
Are my original questions .... by David Watts on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 1:45:28 PM
Yes, I believe so. by Robert Hoogenboom on Tuesday, Feb 5, 2008 at 2:55:53 AM
Oh, the irony by Tom Murphy on Saturday, Feb 2, 2008 at 9:20:05 PM
Tom, we all thank you. by David Watts on Saturday, Feb 2, 2008 at 11:21:20 PM
Perception becoming reality by Tom Murphy on Saturday, Feb 2, 2008 at 11:45:16 PM
Tom, I appreciate your response. by David Watts on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 12:33:32 AM
I would like to know what you really believe. by David Watts on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 2:15:07 PM
What I believe... by Tom Murphy on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 3:13:49 PM
Just love it.... by richard on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 7:38:49 PM
Love that's a little too convenient by Tom Murphy on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 8:37:02 PM
What about the flight recorder? by David Watts on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 8:53:56 PM
Also, is there anything about the official story ... by David Watts on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 10:11:13 PM
The previous questions were for Tom and Richard... by David Watts on Tuesday, Feb 5, 2008 at 12:14:26 AM
Anything is open-ended - substantial is better by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Feb 5, 2008 at 9:28:43 PM
Is there anything about the official story .... by David Watts on Wednesday, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:26:45 AM
Tom ...... by David Watts on Wednesday, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:31:08 AM
Richard, I don't make a categorical claim that no planes hit by Robert Hoogenboom on Tuesday, Feb 5, 2008 at 3:39:38 AM
Where exactly has the no-planes theory been very well by Robert Hoogenboom on Tuesday, Feb 5, 2008 at 3:46:13 AM