::::::::
It seems there is Main Stream Media coverage of alternate 9/11 explanations afterall. It's just they're being shown in England on the BBC2, not in America. At least not to my knowledge so far. Here's part of a message I received in response to a comment I made to a 9/11 article here at Op Ed News about the lack of MSM coverage.(Hey there hoss,
I read your comment on oped news about the 9/11 theories concerning "The Masses" and I thought you might like to be aware that over here in merry old England there was a program on BBC2 at 9pm last Sunday (18th Feb) all about the conspiracy surrounding 9/11.
Here's a link to the "Conspiracy Files" site.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/6160775.stm)
So why in England but not here in America where surely such coverage would draw ratings and sponsors? Which as far as I am aware would translate into money for the MSM business. It's not referred to as corporate media for nothing. Besides, MSM has covered other famous American mysterys if for no other reason than to debunk the conspiracy theorys and support Government commissions or investigative findings.But at least this way the information gets out there. Like the Kennedy assasinations, UFO's and so on. I think it's a relevant question.
I think answers to this question plus MSM coverage of 9/11 will prevent futher questions like: Is American MSM still a corporate business or has it become a propaganda instrument for an Oligarchy? An Oligarchy that doesn't wish to be challenged on their War ON Terror and the insiduous and not so subtle erosion of the covenent of citizenship known affectionately as the US Constitution.
We can't have it both ways. We either are receiving the benefit of a free press that reports storys based on importance and interest to their audience or we're not. One Exception, especially this one, does break the covenent.
Maybe it's time to worry about the courts denying Guantanomo prisoners their criminal rights in American Justice. Saying they're terrorists isn't good enough. The hypocricy is that they are being charged and tried in America and America is supposed to have a covenent already in place to deal with it. This new so called military Justice thing is clearly being used to convict people on charges where the evidence against them doesn't stand up to the usual judicial scrutiny. Calling them terrorists pre trial so to deny them due process is at least prejudicial. Don't you think? If these people are guilty of something then why all the secrecy and special measures? Someone got something to hide? Never mind, the answer will be because it's for my own good. My security and protection. I've already heard that.
So what's it going to be America? Are we the people going to get to participate in our democracy anymore or not? IF so we need to get Information from our media. Information that allows me to decide for myself what is true. And Terrorist has to go back to being a criminal charge that needs to be proven in court. Not a pretext for a kangaroo trial. Let the government submit their case against these Guantanomo prisoners to a jury of American citizens. A jury trial is the best means conceived so far to prevent uneven justice.
These two issues are inextricably tied. 9/11 truth and Terrorists trials. Right now as a citizen, I'm feeling a little short changed on both. I'd hate to think someone was trying to be dishonest. So let's clear it up together as a nation, all out in the open.
We CAN handle the TRUTH. It's our country.
