Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

(9/11) NIST: a. Free Fall Requires No Resistance b. WTC7 was in Free Fall

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)

opednews.com

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall.

::::::::

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Free fall (Part III) is now posted on YouTube. This concluding segment explores the implications of NIST's concession (to easily observed reality) that free fall occurred.

 

I.  A Crumpling (naturally collapsing) building absorbs energy making free fall impossible.  -- David Chandler, Architects and Engineers for 911Truth.

II.  NIST agrees:  Free fall in a building collapsing naturally  ("crumpling") is impossible. 

III. NIST:  Only when structural components/structural resistances are removed can buildings free fall -- not "crumpling" and not "naturally collapsing" as in a controlled demolition.

IV.  NIST:  WTC7 was in free falli.e., NO structural resistance and not "crumpling" and not "naturally collapsing" which means WTC7 was a controlled demolition.

"NIST Admits Free Fall" - Watch at least Part III:

http://www.911blogger.com/blog/5343  


http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypage.php?did=11488  -- NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / False Flag Attack.

 

I'm a dull and simple lad Cannot tell water from champagne

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Very encouraging by Nick van Nes on Friday, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:10:00 PM
New tactic by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:16:53 AM
Hey albury, these aren't lies. by David Watts on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:10:07 PM
Chandler by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:59:03 PM
What is the problem? by David Watts on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:17:42 PM
No problem at all by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:56:48 PM