9/11: Tom Murphy Provides the Proof 9/11 was inside job!
Tom Murphy, after all of his extremely intensive research, -- as evidenced by the citing of a plethora of “scientific” arguments and formulae throughout his myriad comments on OpEdNews postings -- has stunningly declared the existence of molten metal at ground zero!
In a posting on March 10, 2008 (....“What is [9/11] Truth?” ), Mr. Murphy stated, “The existence of molten metal at the base of the debris piles has never been proven, aside from anecdotal recollections made by workers' statements and a handful of misinterpreted photographs.”
How did Mr. Murphy go from “anecdotal recollections” and “misinterpreted photographs” to attempting to explain the “cause of the molten metal?” He viewed a video at a link provided by Mr. Scott Ledger.
The simple proof that Mr. Murphy provides goes like this:
Tom Murphy says there was molten metal beneath the Twin Towers, therefore Tom agrees the eyewitness accounts of the molten metal were accurate.
Given that eyewitness accounts also exist that say that there was molten metal beneath WTC7; and given that NASA thermal maps show the temperatures at the site of WTC7 to be just as hot as at the sites of the Twin Towers and therefore the two are consistent; therefore, molten metal was also present below WTC7.
Given that Tom Murphy only attempts to explain away the molten metal beneath the two 110 story buildings in terms of condensing the full 110 stories during the collapses; and given that Tom did not attempt to explain away the molten metal beneath WTC7 in terms of compressing only 47 stories during its collapse -- I contend an absolutely logical and reasonable conclusion; therefore, by omission, Tom implies there must be another reason for the molten metal to have been below WTC7.
Given that there is only one sensible/possible 'other' reason for the existence of molten metal below WTC7: thermite; and given that there is evidence for the existence of thermite; and given that the only reason for thermite to be present would be for the purpose of carrying out a controlled demolition of WTC7, a steel-frame building; therefore, it must be concluded -- not even considering all of the other evidence -- that WTC7 was brought down in a controlled demolition.
Given that it takes at least weeks to plan and prepare a building like WTC7 for a controlled demolition; and given that there is no reason to believe anyone other than “insiders” could have carried out the advanced preparation and actual execution of the controlled demolition of the secure WTC7 (“CIA Building”); therefore the controlled demolition of WTC7 was carried out by “insiders.”
Given that WTC7 was brought down on 9/11; and given that there could be no reason to demolish WTC7 other than to be included with the other events on 9/11; therefore “insiders” also planned and executed the other events on 9/11, i.e., 9/11 was an inside job.
Tom, let me be the first to welcome you to the 911Truth movement.
