Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / False Flag Attack.

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

NIST's proof that 9/11 was an inside job / false flag attack goes like this:

::::::::


9/11: NIST Provides the Proof 9-11 was an Inside Job / False Flag Attack.

The following simple proof regarding World Trade Center 7 (WTC7) comes from David Chandler's excellent and invaluable video series, "NIST Admits Free Fall."

NIST's proof that 9/11 was an inside job / false flag attack goes like this:

I. Given that a crumpling or naturally collapsing building absorbs energy making free fall impossible (David Chandler, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth);

II. And Given that NIST agrees: Free fall is impossible in a building crumpling or collapsing naturally due to structural resistance (Shyam Sunder, NIST);

III. Therefore, NIST understands that it requires no structural resistance for a building to free fall.

IV. Given that NIST showed WTC7 was in free fall;

V. And Given that the only way free fall can occur is to remove all structural resistance at once and that can only be done with a controlled demolition;

VI. Therefore, the free falling WTC7 was a controlled demolition.

(The following follows logically from the above):

Given that it takes at least weeks to plan and prepare a building like WTC7 for a controlled demolition; and given that there is no reason to believe anyone other than "insiders" could have carried out the advanced preparation and actual execution of the controlled demolition of the secure WTC7 ("CIA Building"); therefore the controlled demolition of WTC7 was carried out by "insiders."

Given that WTC7 was brought down on 9/11; and given that there could be no reason to demolish WTC7 other than to be included with the other events on 9/11; therefore "insiders" also planned and executed the other events on 9/11, i.e., 9/11 was an inside job.

Thank you NIST for providing the proof that 9/11 was an inside job / false flag attack.

http://www.911blogger.com/blog/5343 -- "NIST Admits Free Fall"

click here (9/11) NIST: a. Free Fall Requires No Resistance b. WTC7 was in Free Fall

 

I'm a dull and simple lad Cannot tell water from champagne
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 35 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Now all we have to do is get the Amerikan sheeple ... by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:28:58 PM
You've never bothered to read NCSTAR 1A. Unlik... by albury smith on Sunday, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:16:36 PM
I have read the relevant sections of the NIST repo... by David Watts on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:50:13 AM
"Do you have any idea how they derived their ... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:29:44 AM
That was a rhetorical question.  Just because... by David Watts on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:37:05 AM
to proving your absurd hypothesis, David. The firs... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:42:28 AM
Good grief. You actually have to understand the pr... by Michael Fullerton on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:48:47 PM
albury, why are you bringing up the Towers here? &... by David Watts on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:30:36 PM
pointed out an obvious error in the preliminary, f... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:43:02 PM
You asked me if I had any idea how they derived it... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46:54 AM
The thermates that Dr.Jones has identified are not... by Jay Easwaran on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:34:47 PM
but incendiaries only burn vertically unless diver... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:53:24 PM
Sol-gel nano-thermites can be sprayed on. Wherever... by Michael Fullerton on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:22:25 PM
So you just secretly rip the walls and column encl... by albury smith on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:21:48 PM
The fire-proofing on several floors was replaced i... by Michael Fullerton on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:57:17 PM
If we're still talking about WTC 7, there was ... by albury smith on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:29:24 PM
You've reached so far you've fallen on you... by Michael Fullerton on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:02:49 PM
What did your fabricated account of WTC upgrading ... by albury smith on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:58:13 PM
Smith, take your head out of the sand or go back u... by Munich on Sunday, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:52:16 PM
Smith, take your head out of the sand or go back u... by Munich on Sunday, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:39:47 PM
claims by the "engineers" from AE911&quo... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:13:03 AM
Why not explain specifically what this link is sup... by Michael Fullerton on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:34:21 PM
logo precedes his videos. If you're ... by albury smith on Monday, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:46:14 PM
It would do us all good to brush up on the ad-homi... by editnetwork on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:17:58 AM
The example you just provided, while totally ignor... by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:49:45 AM
albury,   how about a comment on the proof it... by David Watts on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:03:29 PM
under "Chandler and Steven Jones" above.... by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:30:08 PM
As has already been pointed out to you, the bulk o... by Michael Fullerton on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:34:49 PM
per se prove that the building had planted explosi... by albury smith on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:34:02 PM
The collapse time does not prove the building had ... by Michael Fullerton on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:06:07 PM
requested the input data for NIST's ANSYS fini... by albury smith on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:55:10 PM
But of course, the "collapse" of WTC 7 w... by Nordic on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:17:55 PM
looked a great deal like a C/D, mostly because the... by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:56:32 PM
Mr. Albury... It has become so trite to read your... by Cinderfella on Wednesday, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:41:39 AM
. . '... paid to try to stop Nine-Eleven Op tr... by meremark on Tuesday, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:28:18 PM